Category: Clarity for Entrepreneurs

Practical insights on a systems view of business, the owner’s role, management decisions, teams, and resources.

  • No Clients: A Fact or a Task? Who Is Responsible for the Resources, Income and Resilience of an Independent Practice

    “I have no clients.” It may be true. But it is not yet an explanation of what is happening, nor a final diagnosis of a business or professional practice.

    You can observe that client numbers are low, income has fallen, or people enquire but do not buy. From there, you can treat the situation as the new normal—blaming the market, customers’ lack of money or excessive competition—or approach it as a system that can be examined.

    A more useful question is: what is producing the result I am getting now? The purpose is not self-blame. It is to regain influence where influence is possible.

    Responsibility for resources is not blame

    Owners, independent professionals and practitioners are responsible for how they use resources within their sphere of influence. That does not mean they are to blame for everything. We cannot control the economy, other people’s decisions, war, illness, platform algorithms or changes in legislation.

    Responsibility starts with questions such as: How do I use money and attention? How do I recover? Which decisions am I postponing? Which hypotheses am I testing? Do I understand my clients? Am I willing to consider that an offer I created earlier may no longer match a real need? These are questions of agency, not guilt.

    “No clients” is the beginning of an inquiry

    The same visible result can come from very different systems. A strong service may have little visibility. An audience may see an expert but not understand why this particular offer is worth buying. A product may interest its creator without meeting a current client need. Someone may struggle to name their price; another may attract people who are not buyers; a third may have outgrown an offer but keep selling an older version of their work. Sometimes an owner formally wants growth while privately resisting the scale they say they want.

    That is why I prefer to map the system before asking someone to push harder.

    What we examine

    1. The owner’s relationship with the work

    Why do you have this business or practice? What does it help you create—income, freedom, mastery, influence, a certain quality of life, service, or intellectual challenge? There is no right answer; there is an honest one. It is difficult to lead a system without a living connection to it.

    2. The business’s primary task

    What does the business actually do, for whom, and what change does it create? Why would someone pay for it? An owner may know what they want to give while knowing less about the customer’s current need. The next step may be customer conversations, testing assumptions, changing the message or redesigning the product. That is not a mystical answer; it is identifying information missing from a decision.

    3. Who the offer is for

    “My client is anyone who needs this” often means the audience has not yet been defined. It can help to distinguish current and potential clients, audience segments, the buyer and the person who uses a service. A product may be right for a specific group and irrelevant to everyone else. The task is to meet a concrete need, not persuade everyone.

    4. What the client is actually buying

    Professionals often describe sessions, tools and years of study. Clients need to understand what will change for them. We can examine the value an offer creates, what people are willing to pay for, which elements are useful and whether the price matches the value they perceive. A business organises an exchange: the client receives value; the business receives payment. If the exchange is not happening, we can investigate where the connection breaks.

    5. Mission and what remains after a sale

    Mission is not a decorative slogan. It asks what happens when a business fulfils its main task well: how does it affect the owner, clients, employees, partners and the surrounding environment? When actual work diverges from the mission, a person may work hard and earn money while losing interest and meaning. It may be useful to ask not only “How do I attract more clients?” but also “Do I still want to grow this work?”

    The owner’s inner resilience

    The state of the person making key decisions is part of a business’s operating infrastructure. Chronic overload can make analysis, alternatives, tolerance of uncertainty and non-reactive decisions harder. Work on resilience is not about staying positive at all times. It can help an owner notice what is happening, distinguish facts from reactions, separate personal history from business needs, and identify the resources and responsibilities available now.

    Why can a colleague charge more?

    Instead of counting someone else’s revenue, look at the system behind the price: how value is communicated, which audience has been built, what the client buys, what experience they receive, and what resources and responsibility support the offer. A high fee rarely exists separately from the wider business model.

    People are free not to buy a service. It may not be timely, fit their needs or appeal to them. “I am not choosing this service now” and “this service cannot be worth that much” are different statements. An honest decision about one’s priorities is more useful than devaluing another professional.

    Resources in an independent practice

    For a psychologist, consultant, coach, trainer, doctor or educator, personal resources are part of the professional infrastructure. Rest, learning, supervision, support, fair compensation and declining disproportionately draining projects are elements of managing a practice—not rewards to earn after the work is done.

    From observation to inquiry

    There is a difference between “I have no clients” and “I am not satisfied with my current client flow; I want to understand which parts of the system produce it and what I can change.” The second statement opens room to examine the owner’s position, product, value, price, exchange, audience, communication, resources and next-stage strategy.

    After an initial inquiry, the appropriate tool may be marketing research, customer conversations, a product change, financial analysis, psychological work or a business constellation. Sometimes another professional is the right person to involve. No single method should be expected to explain everything.

    In a longer engagement, we can examine the owner’s connection to the work, the business’s task and mission, customers and needs, product and value, pricing and exchange, structure, resources, losses of money and attention, and decisions for the next stage. The goal is not to make a client dependent on a consultant. It is to improve the client’s view of the system and the quality of their own decisions.

    If you dislike the result you are getting, that is a reason to begin an inquiry—not to blame yourself, but to regain the influence available to you. In my work, a business constellation is one tool for viewing a situation from another position and forming hypotheses. Those hypotheses need to be checked against facts; the method does not guarantee financial outcomes.

    Oksana Kurant
    Psychologist and systemic business consultant

    Request individual work

  • When a Business Gets Stuck: Individual Systemic Inquiry with Metaphorical Cards

    When an owner has reviewed the numbers, talked with the team and held several meetings, yet the decision keeps slipping, it may help to look at the situation from another angle. A project can move in fits and starts, arguments for and against can cancel each other out, and responsibility can quietly return to the owner.

    A systemic perspective helps examine the connections between parts of a situation, notice the owner’s own response and form hypotheses that can be tested in day-to-day work.

    Systemic constellations in management

    In Systemic Constellations in the Context of Management, Claude Rosselet and Georg Senoner describe a staged way of exploring complex organisational situations. Roles, interests and elements of a system are represented spatially, making relationships and overlooked questions easier to discuss.

    The authors share company examples in which progress followed when participants considered stakeholders’ perspectives, improved communication and agreed on next actions. These stories do not establish that one method works universally. They illustrate a broader point: a decision depends not only on its logic on paper, but also on people, roles, resources and the conditions for implementation.

    A systemic view can be useful when a business question involves connected elements: owner and team, customer promise and delivery capacity, authority and accountability, growth plans and available resources. It broadens the inquiry; it does not replace data checks, financial analysis or specialist advice.

    My format begins with a specific question

    In individual work I combine a systemic review of a business situation, a psychological perspective and metaphorical associative cards. An image can help a client put words to something not yet easy to articulate: tension, doubt, a conflict of roles or a desired change.

    This is not fortune-telling, and an image does not provide a ready-made answer about what is “really” happening in a company. It is a prompt for questions: What do you notice in the image? How does it relate to your situation? Which facts support this interpretation, and which contradict it? What else might explain what is happening?

    We move from an association to a hypothesis and then to a way of testing it. If the starting statement is “the team does not take responsibility,” we clarify which decisions the team is authorised to make, what happens after mistakes, how work is allocated and how results are assessed. Possible explanations may include unclear authority, overload, a skills gap or the owner’s habit of taking decisions back. Each is a hypothesis to check against practice.

    Why the owner’s role matters

    A business is more than processes and metrics. It is a space an owner creates and develops to pursue an intention, create value and earn revenue. Products meet customer needs, people take roles, decisions are made and resources are allocated. At the same time, business resilience also depends on the team, the market, the offer and external conditions.

    The owner’s position matters, but this does not mean every business difficulty is caused by the owner’s psychology. Markets, competition, financing, processes, teams and other circumstances all affect outcomes. Still, an owner’s response to uncertainty, conflict or risk may influence which decisions are noticed, delayed, delegated or reconsidered.

    An owner may want to scale while feeling anxious when decisions are made without them, or know a price should change but find it difficult to state it to a client. We treat such reactions as material for inquiry, not as a diagnosis or a predetermined cause.

    What an individual session offers

    The session focuses on one question and on the information the client chooses to share. Unlike a group format, there is no need to discuss the situation in front of other participants. This can matter when the topic concerns a partnership, finances, a team or a decision not yet announced.

    Online work makes it possible to meet from different locations. Cards can be used as a digital deck or image; a spatial model can be represented with objects, a sketch or positions on screen. We choose the method to fit the question and technical conditions.

    This can reduce travel time and help us get to the issue sooner. Pace depends on the complexity of the situation, clarity of the question, willingness to consider alternatives and access to relevant facts. One meeting will not necessarily resolve a complex issue.

    How the work proceeds

    1. Clarify the question. What is happening, what decision is needed and what would make the meeting useful?
    2. Build context. Separate observable facts from interpretations and consider participants, roles, constraints and prior actions.
    3. Explore connections and responses. Use conversation, systemic modelling and, where appropriate, metaphorical cards.
    4. Form several hypotheses. Do not mistake the first emotionally compelling explanation for the only one.
    5. Plan a test. Choose a next step, the information needed and a criterion for review.

    For example, instead of concluding that “the team resists change,” we can check whether people understand the goal, helped shape it, have authority and resources, and know what will stop being a priority when a new process begins.

    Limits of the method

    Systemic inquiry and metaphorical cards do not predict the future, establish objective causes on their own or guarantee increased revenue, a returning customer or a successful launch. They can help generate questions and working hypotheses. Management decisions should be checked against facts, participant feedback, metrics and relevant professional expertise.

    The client decides what details to share. An image is not evidence of another person’s intentions, and a constellation model should not be the sole basis for employment, financial or legal decisions.

    My professional approach

    I draw on systemic approaches to organisations and management developed by earlier practitioners and combine them with individual psychological work using metaphorical cards. The point is not an impressive image; it is the path from image to a precise question, from question to hypothesis, and from hypothesis to an action that can be tested.

    My aim is to help an owner see more options, define their role more clearly and choose a next step that fits their goals and the actual conditions of the business. This is a structured way to explore a situation and bring decisions back to practice, not a promise of instant results.

    If a difficult question keeps returning—about the owner’s role, pricing, team, partnership, product or the next stage of growth—we can begin with one working session. We will clarify the question, boundaries, expected value and format. The decision about continuing remains yours.

    Oksana Kurant
    Psychologist and systemic business consultant

    Request an individual session